Environmental, Health and Safety News
Nov 30, 2007
  "The Electric Vehicle and the Burden of History"

We have learned so little with soooo much

1900: All US cars produced: 33% steam cars, 33% EV, and 33% gasoline cars. Poll at the National Automobile Show in NYC showed people's first choice for automobiles was electric followed closely by steam. Yep only 33% were gas...

Learn more EV history at:

http://www.eaaev.org/History/index.html

 
  CBS News Seeks 'Hip' Environmental Reporter, No 'Knowledge of Enviro' Necessary

According to a new job posting on JournalismJobs.com CBS News has set a low bar for their reporting. CBS News is seeking a reporter for its 'eco beat' who does not need any "knowledge of the enviro beat," but must be "funny, irreverent and hip, oozing enthusiasm and creative energy," according to job posting. The potential CBS News employee must also be "vibrant" and bring "a dash of humor to our coverage."    (LINK)

 

Hey, Why would A news station care about content or exerprience when their own "green washers" and "climatologist" don't have them ;-)

 
  EPA notifies BP of major clean-air violations FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 07-OPA233 CHICAGO (Nov. 29, 2007) - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 today notified BP Products North America Inc. of alleged violations of multiple Clean Air Act requirements at its Whiting, Ind., refinery. Click to read full. 
  DOE and Wisconsin Launch Industrial Efficiency Partnership

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the State of Wisconsin today announced a voluntary collaboration to promote greater industrial energy efficiency throughout the state.  DOE, Wisconsin, Wisconsin's Focus on Energy (Focus), and CleanTech Partners have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to foster increased awareness and use of energy efficient practices and technologies by industries.Read the full Progress Alert.

From  Laura B.

 
  January 19, 2008 Due Date for Facilities to File Chemical "Top Screen" with Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued the Final Appendix A "Chemicals of Interest" list on November 20, 2007.  This rule requires affected facilities to file a "Top Screen" submittal within 60 days after the appendix was published, which is January 19, 2008. 
 
Appendix A has over 300 "Chemicals of Interest" and each chemical is classified according to hazards and security risks defined in 13 different regulatory categories.  A facility must register with the DHS and then file a Top Screen if it has any chemical listed in the Appendix over the specified threshold amount.  Although specific exclusions are provided for calculating quantities of certain chemicals, there is NO general exemption provided for small businesses, including agriculture or college laboratories, from the Top Screen submittal requirement. 
 
DHS is authorized to impose penalties of up to $25,000 per day for facilities that fail to comply with the regulation.
 
Some of the over 300 "Chemicals of Interest" are as follows:
 
  Analytical Crack Heads on $50 a ton of CO2
Reducing US Greenhouse Gas Emissions: How Much at What Cost?
The United States could reduce projected 2030 emissions of greenhouse gases significantly at a cost of less than $50 per ton of CO2...



Haase Comments:

This report is free for a reason, it is not worth the paper it was printed on…
 
Citing a report that reflects a "cost" associated with reduction is a "oxymoron", but swaying public perception and information in a paper called a "Research Report", is both political and financial propaganda.
 
But, I guess this has become common place in the utilization of "global warming" tactics based on "fear and greed marketing 101" to make the few rich for the many to suffer.
 
Green energy technology is currently the most lucrative financial investment for any energy companys (and growing faster than the .com boon)… or is math not a "The Conference Board 's" strong point . It must not be to anyone who would call dumping $100 Trillion dollars "manageable costs … not requiring big changes in consumer lifestyles,"
 
Billions of Eco-Energy dollars are being invested by the strongest U.S. companies including BP, GE and even Google (FOR PROFIT).
 
According to the DOE (and a few other's good at math) a $100 Trillion dollar investment in the U.S. geothermal, hydro or nuke programs would get America off middle east oil and return billions of annual dollars into our nations economy for decades to come.
 
However, like all things American, I believe investors and our nations great innovators will build better private energy programs without the need for financially "bloated" government overrun utilities.
 
Regardless, just throwing trillions CO2 reduction scams will do nothing to stop the Indonesian and Asian impact growing three to four fold annually of both production of green house gases and energy consumption.
 
Just as America handed these nations the technology, jobs, finical markets and resources to create their new eco and energy problems…. We also need to show them how to properly mitigate and resolve these problems.
 
In 2006 Total US Greenhouse Gas Emissions were down 1.5% From 2005… and the ONLY way to pull Asia and Indonesia out of eco and energy destruction is to the lead "the way".
 
The American way, "Do more good than harm".
 
Seriously, the only way for the authors of this report to get anything constructive out of it is to "put it in their crack pipe and smoke it".
 
Have a good weekend,
 
Chris 
 
  Ocean fertilization won't work - final blow to controversial geoengineering option - biopact.com Scientists have revealed an important discovery that raises serious doubts concerning the viability of plans to fertilize the ocean to solve global warming, a projected $100 billion 'geoengineering' venture that has attracted a lot of criticism from environmentalists, climate scientists, civil society and oceanographers who think the scheme may destroy marine environments. The concept was recently deemed 'not scientifically justified' by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) (earlier post). The bioenergy community for its part is opposed to the idea, because it distracts attention from a much safer solution to global warming, namely the production of negative emissions from bioenergy. But now scientists deal the final blow to the controversial concept, saying it simply won't work.

Ocean fertilization, the process of adding iron or other nutrients to the ocean to cause large algal blooms, has been proposed as a possible 'geoengineering' solution to global warming because the growing algae absorb carbon dioxide as they grow. But research performed at Stanford University, the Carnegie Institution of Washington and Oregon State University, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, now concludes that ocean fertilization is not an effective method of reducing CO2 in the atmosphere because of the seasonal dynamics of the way in which algae sink to the bottom of the ocean.

This discovery is very surprising. If, during natural plankton blooms, less carbon actually sinks to deep water than during the rest of the year, then it suggests that the Biological Pump leaks. More material is recycled in shallow water and less sinks to depth, which makes sense if you consider how this ecosystem has evolved in a way to minimize loss. Ocean fertilization schemes, which resemble an artificial summer, may not remove as much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as has been suggested because they ignore the natural processes revealed by this research. - Dr. Michael Lutz, lead author, University of Miami's Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science the sale of offsets or credits from ocean fertilization on the unregulated voluntary markets is basically nothing short of fraudulent.

Read more from Biopact team


 
  Latest Toy Hazard: Asbestos

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, a group created by asbestos victims and their families, bought products from national retailers and had them tested at independent labs. One of the most disturbing findings was high levels of asbestos in powder from a toy CSI fingerprint kit. The powder is intended to be sprinkled on surfaces and brushed with a soft-bristle brush – creating conditions ripe for inhalation.

Andrew Schneider reports on the group's findings in the Seattle P-I, and notes that CBS, which licenses the kit, has asked its licensees to have the kits tested immediately and to remove the toy from the market if it's found to be unsafe.

Why is a small organization – which spent more than $165,000 getting products tested at government-certified labs – taking on the job of policing consumer products? Schneider explains:

(more…)

 
Nov 29, 2007
  "Water Implications of Biofuel Production in the United States".

Excellent discussion of the article I cited that personifies the correlation between current water draw downs and biofuel production.

...addressing the supply side of oil and gas depletion, much hope has been put into the scaling of 'biofuels', by applying new (and old) technologies to annual crops to create ethanol or biodiesel, thus providing chemically viable alternatives to the transportation liquids derived from crude oil. Much of the biofuels debate thus far has focused on their lower energy balance, vis-a-vis crude oil. While this is important, analysis of the impacts on non-energy inputs and impacts should a massive scaling of biofuels occur, urgently needs to be discussed. The National Academy of Sciences recently published a report titled "Water Implications of Biofuel Production in the United States". The paper outlines impacts and limitations on both water availability and water quality that would follow the pursuit of a national strategy to replace liquid fossil fuels with those made from biomass.

Read more VIA- theoildrum.com

Also See my previous posts on issue filed under Waterwars

 
  Andropause Called Workplace Productivity Killer
Quote of the day: (from cal-osha.com)

"Andropause is like death by hormones in the workplace. It kills productivity, it kills relationships, and it kills enthusiasm."

That usually cheerful guy in accounting has suddenly become impatient and moody. Co-workers grumble about the change but may not realize what's behind it: He is going through andropause - the male version of menopause.

Hitting men between the ages of 40 and 55, when their testosterone levels begin to decline, andropause can cause many of the symptoms menopausal women complain about: mood swings, extreme fatigue, temporary bouts of forgetfulness and yes, hot flashes.

"Andropause is like death by hormones in the workplace," says Dr. Lawrence Komer, a physician and medical director of Masters Men's Clinic in Burlington, Ont. "It kills productivity, it kills relationships, and it kills enthusiasm."

Employers can help men cope with andropause at work by educating everyone in the office about it, says Dr. Michael Greenspan, urologist and assistant clinical professor at Ontario's McMaster University. Knowing about it also can help managers and co-workers understand that a middle-aged male employee who has suddenly become irritable and unproductive may need medical help.

Go to the full story in the Toronto Globe & Mail (via cal-osha.com)

 
  "What would Jesus buy"? God for sale from a Chinese Sweatshop

Shouldn't the Association for Christian Retail be asking themselves, "What would Jesus buy"?

The embarrassing fervor of selling has turned some Christian groups into a 'Den of Thieves', but even I didn't think it would include sweatshops.

Ed Brayton of "Dispatches from the Culture Wars" just broke a story on the use of child labor in Chinese sweatshops to produce items sold in Christian stores. Conditions in the shop mentioned don't even come close to meeting minimum standards as required by Chinese law, never mind meeting basic human rights.

From the first part of what seems to be a multiple part story:

The crosses are marketed in the United States by the Association for Christian Retail (ACR, founded as the Christian Booksellers Association). ACR supplies nearly all of the nation's Christian specialty stores with a wide range of items, including Bibles, Christian books, apparel, music, videos, gifts and greeting cards.

Perhaps its largest client is Family Christian Stores, a Grand Rapids-based company that is the biggest Christian retailer in the nation with more than 300 stores. ACR did $4.63 billion in business in 2006, at least a portion of it from the crosses made by workers at the Junxingye Factory in Dongguan, China.


So although I'm somewhat forgiving of sweatshops, I find this story upsetting. Conditions in the Junxingye Factory in Dongguan, China don't even meet minimum standards by Chinese law!

From the article: "Workers are paid just 26½ cents an hour, which is half of China's legal minimum wage (already set at a below-subsistence level) of 55 cents an hour. After fees deducted for room and board, the workers take-home wage can drop to just nine cents an hour."

I'm realistic in that I know how difficult it is for a consumer to determine where and how products are made. I would attach little or no blame to the owners of these crosses. However, as an engineer, I am well aware of the amount of research I do to determine how a product is made, and I'm also aware of the research done by our Procurement department to insure that products we purchase don't violate human rights. We fly our people to other countries in order to see their factories first hand.

And we are just some electronics company, ya know? Dedicated to our customers, and not particularly holy.

I would expect a company in the business of selling Christian goods would be much more careful than the company that I work for...
Read more from Calladus on Culture

Haase Comments: Holiday Consumption - Purchase from ethical companys and manufactures, the savings you reap may be the price of your soul.
 
  Southeast Asia Paying High Environmental Cost For Palm Oil
deforestation_borneo.jpgImage: Small part of the bigger picture - deforestation in Borneo, Indonesia (World Resources Institute)

In its annual Human Development Report released yesterday, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) highlighted the untenable environmental impacts of palm oil production. As a supposedly environmentally-friendly biofuel and healthier food ingredient, the demand for palm oil has risen steadily in recent years and can be found anywhere from cookies Read full here
 
  "Green Team" -"Don't F*&^k with us were GREEN"! Are "Green" activists ever a good idea?
While this is a tragic display of using "green" for a personal excuse to do anything...

I think I liked Will better as an elf.

Labels:

 
  Great Lakes oil town facing a toxic legacy head-on.

In the summer of 2004, Canadian health researchers made a startling discovery in the"the beloved community": sarnia,  Chippewa birth records for the city of Sarnia, an hour north of Detroit—for the past decade, female babies had been outnumbering male babies at a rate of 2:1. Further investigation revealed large numbers of miscarriages, a cluster of reproductive cancers in young women, and widespread neurological problems among the band's children. http://newsreel.org/nav/title.asp?tc=CN0196&s=    (From By David Dempsey the Great Lakes Blogger"

 
Nov 28, 2007
  Words to Gore and Bush for the global warming meeting...
"Let no man pull you low enough to hate him."
Listen, learn, love...   LMartin Luther King Jr.
 
  Growth - Less is more, DOE on the right track...

DOE Report: Efficiency Could Cut Growth in U.S. Energy Use in Half

An aggressive pursuit of energy efficiency in the United States over the next 18 years could cut the nation's growth in energy use by 50% or more, according to a new report. The report, "Vision for 2025: Developing a Framework for Change," was prepared by the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Leadership Group, which comprises more than 60 leading organizations, with DOE and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acting as facilitators. The report sets a goal of achieving all cost-effective energy efficiency improvements throughout the United States by 2025. If that goal is achieved, the nation will spend $100 billion less for energy in 2025 than it would otherwise and will avoid emitting 500 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year. The nation will also achieve $500 billion in net savings from its energy efficiency investments.

To achieve that goal, the report calls for placing a high priority on cost-effective energy efficiency improvements, creating energy efficiency incentives for utilities, and implementing the latest technologies. The report recommends establishing policies, incentives, delivery mechanisms, metrics, and utility billing systems that not only encourage energy efficiency but also measure its effectiveness and reward utilities for successful energy efficiency programs. The report also emphasizes the sharing of information, both regionally and nationally, and the use advanced communication technologies to keep utilities in touch with their customers and aware of how their customers are using energy. See the EPA press release (PDF 16 KB) and the full report (PDF 1.3 MB). Download Adobe Reader.

The National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency was developed last year by the leadership group, which includes 30 electric and gas utilities, 17 state agencies, and 12 other organizations, with DOE and EPA as facilitators. An additional 24 organizations are observing the work of the leadership group. Since its launch in late July 2006, 120 organizations have made commitments to advance energy efficiency under the National Action Plan. An EPA document released in conjunction with the new report tallies all those commitments and the achievements to date. The participating organizations include government agencies and utility commissions in 26 states: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. A number of utilities, corporations, and regional and national organizations are also participating. See the EPA Web site and list of commitments and achievements (PDF 646 KB).

 
  Quote of week: "confidence is the ignorance of those who claim to know the answer"
"I am not ashamed of this ignorance of mine. On the contrary, I am ashamed of the confidence of those who claim to know the answer."
Vaclav Klaus, president of the Czech Republic, from this link

Labels:

 
  Freedom, not climate, is at risk .... We are basing our current international law, consumer purchases and potentially our next leader of the free world on the "politics of global warming"

The President of the Czech Republic "climate change just propaganda?"
Due to advances in technology, increases in disposable wealth, the rationality of institutions and the ability of countries to organize themselves, the adaptability of human society has been radically increased. It will continue to increase and will solve any potential consequences of mild climate changes.

I agree with Professor Richard Lindzen from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who said: "future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century's developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age"

Regardless of your views on the "politics of global warming" this article is the viewpoint of many world leaders...
Read full here

Labels:

 
  Take the Global Warming Test

Excellent little quiz available here, courtesy of www.globalwarmingheartland.org

Labels:

 
  "tremendous." Job of inaction to Great Lakes protection laws

CBS recently produced a video on the quagga mussel problem in the Great Lakes, and the introduction of invasive species in the ballast water of ocean going ships. It's always good to see main stream media taking notice of Great Lakes ecological issues, even if they tend to be pretty superficial in their coverage.

In the video John Jamian, the President of the Seaway Great Lakes Trade Association, says ""I think the shipping industry has done a tremendous job, given the fact that they were not set up for this kind of business, in terms of solving these problems."

Hmm. I guess I'd be forced to agree if you could convince me that decades of inaction followed by active resistance to any laws forcing them to deal with the problem is "tremendous." And perhaps, while you're at it, you could explain exactly why they are not "set up" to solve "these problems." I guess being responsible corporate citizens just isn't in the business plan. Comment and link by By Steve Huyser-Honig

 
Nov 27, 2007
  "Are Your Products Safe? You Can't Tell"
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel: Labels often fail to list compounds that can disrupt biological development
Chemical Fallout

Click to enlarge

Warning: Chemicals in the packaging, surfaces or contents of many products may cause long-term health effects, including cancers of the breast, brain and testicles; lowered sperm counts, early puberty and other reproductive system defects; diabetes; attention deficit disorder, asthma and autism. "U.S. regulators promised a decade ago to screen more than 15,000 chemicals for effects on the endocrine system. Officials identified the program as a top priority. Browner appointed the first panel of scientists to build a framework for how to screen the chemicals. She left the agency after the presidential election in 2000.

More than $80 million later, the government program has yet to screen its first chemical. So far, not one has been screened. The government's proposed tests lack new measures that would spot dangerous chemicals older screens could miss. Hundreds of products have been banned in countries around the world but are available here without warning." Read more from Susanne Rust, Meg Kissinger, and Cary Spivak

Key Findings A Journal Sentinel investigation found:
U.S. regulators promised a decade ago to screen more than 15,000 chemicals for effects on the endocrine system. So far, not one has been screened.
The government's proposed tests lack new measures that would spot dangerous chemicals older screens could miss.
Hundreds of products have been banned in countries around the world but are available here without warning.
 
 
  MI- "Most sites will never be fully cleaned up," only focus is on mitigating risk.

... 20 years into cleanup work funded by $760 million in bond funds, these lurking threats remain and continue to multiply?

Why are poisons still in soil and water years after their discovery? Where did the cleanup money go?

Voters may remember them as the Environmental Protection and Clean Michigan Initiative bonds. But the protection and cleanup projects undertaken with that tax money voters approved in 1988 and 1998 were never intended to completely eliminate the sources of poisonous chemicals or gases, state officials say.
The reality is, many sites are too big, too complicated and too costly to even consider a complete cleanup, said David O'Donnell, supervisor of the DEQ's Kalamazoo district cleanup program.
Read full here from Kalamazoo Gazette



Source:
http://daviddempsey.typepad.com/
 
Nov 26, 2007
  How China is eating the world
People grumble about the price of bread and the gasoline, but they should also be aware that nations emerging from poverty - China, India, Brazil - are exacting a heavy price on those left behind.
  • The world is seeing some dairy prices up 200%, the cost of wheat doubling and pork up 50 percent.
  • In the past decade alone, meat consumption in China has been rising at an average of 2kg per capita a year. Over the past few decades, consumption of meat in developing countries has grown at a rate of 5 percent to 6 percent a year; with consumption of dairy products at 4 percent.
  • Meat consumption is growing 10 times faster in newly industrialised countries than in, say, bacon-loving Britain.
  • Poultry is the fastest growing sector worldwide: it represented 13 percent of meat production in the 1960s, compared with 28 percent now.
 
According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), about half of the world's economic growth this year will be accounted for by Brazil, Russia, India and China.

India, staggeringly, is contributing more growth to the world economy than the United States, but China is by far the most powerful engine of growth - more so than the US, the eurozone and Japan combined.

So, "China saves the world" - or at least helps to maintain global economic growth around the 5 percent mark. Were it not for China and these other emerging economies, the world might well be staring a recession in the face.

Yet this phenomenon is not an unalloyed economic good. As recent news about Rio Tinto and BHP demonstrates, the commodities price boom has led to huge valuations for companies in this field; great for their shareholders, but another signal that the insatiable Chinese demand for oil, copper, zinc, nickel and all the other raw materials of industrialisation is pushing the prices of those commodities to ever-higher peaks.

The International Energy Agency (ING) has warned that Chinese and Indian crude oil imports will almost quadruple by 2030, creating a supply "crunch" as soon as 2015.

Research from ING suggests that marginal Chinese demand for oil, as a percentage of the growth in total consumption, rose to around 72 percent in 2006, from 10 percent in the 1980s. This marginal demand could grow to close to 100 percent of total consumption growth in 2007.

Such an appetite brings with it its own dangers, both to China and the rest of the world. As China pushes the price of oil higher, for example, the UK is threatened with "slowflation" - where a slowing economy co-exists with higher prices of fuel - and food.

In January, President George Bush pledged a biofuel target of 20 percent of US fuel consumption within 10 years. This means more of America's corn harvest being put into the tanks of cars rather than the bellies of Mexicans, with upward effects on the price of grain.

"The 35-billion gallons of ethanol required to meet the 20 percent target will account for 40 percent of the US corn crop by 2017," Garthwaite says.

Worldwide, "the combined impact of these targets commits 96-million hectares or 12 percent of global arable and permanent cropland to biofuel production".

Read more from Source & Copyright, Sunday Tribune -  Original URL
Link source:ecoearth.info
 
 
  cal-osha Quote of the day:

"How many more deaths, anguish and sorry must be visited upon innocent mineworkers, their families and the communities in which they live before we can say enough is enough?"

Senzeni Zokwana, president of South Africa's National Union of Mineworkers in unveiling plans for a first-ever strike of gold and platinum mines over safety issues.

Go to home page at www.cal-osha.com

 
  Sex hormone in a can?
FOX investigates " Bisphenol A" after reading my blog?
Old news on my blog... but ball is rolling on plastic in food products
 
You may not know it, but every time you open a can of soup, vegetables, even beer and soda you may actually be swallowing a sex hormone. It's been going on for decades and it's even approved by the federal government.  Watch Fox Story Here
 
 

Haase Comment- "If the general public had any idea of the consequences of using hazardous chemical to make consumables, they would all make smarter purchases that save our future"
 
Also see more reports on plastic risks here:
 
Online resources on possible risks and alternatives to plastics for children:
Environment California report:
www.links.sfgate.com/ZCM
EWG report on bisphenol A: www.ewg.org/reports/bisphenola/consumertips.php
 
Read All Posts on BPA here

Labels:

 
  Hydrogen and "Fuel cell cars won't save the world" VW, GM

Filed under "I told you so"

Looks like the beginning of a trend toward realism: By Joe on Solutions climateprogress.org

One of the most senior forward-thinkers at Europe's bigger car-maker … Volkswagen's head of research Dr Jurgen Leohold told Autocar that he thinks fuel cell cars like VW's own HyMotion Touran research car are not the future of alternative power, and are only really being developed as a sop to ever-tightening emissions laws in places such as California.

Describing them as a "marketing exercise," he said their inherent problem lies with producing
the hydrogen fuel to power them, and in establishing an infrastructure of hydrogen filling stations. "Because hydrogen has to be produced using existing power, CO2 emissions are still an issue," he said.

Ouch!


Also see: Dream of hydrogen car goes down in flames

Ballard -- the Canadian fuel-cell company that once hoped to be the "Intel Inside of the hydrogen car revolution -- has sold off its automotive fuel-cell business to Daimler and Ford.

The story has a keen interpretation of the sale's meaning from Research Capital analyst Jon Hykawy:

[Ballard] would never contemplate such as move if it thought it had any chance of making good on the millions it has poured into that research -- and the vast financing it has been able to raise with promises of the hydrogen highway, a route to the future that has never materialized, but seduced investors with visions of cars that spewed only water from their tailpipes.

"If you knew, talking to your automotive partners, that they had a commercialization timeline that was three to five years out, I suspect you would be holding tight," said Mr. Hykawy.

Hykaway, like most independent observers of the automobile industry, is far more realistic about hydrogen than most advocates:

In my view, the hydrogen car was never alive. The problem was never could you build a fuel cell that would consume hydrogen, produce electricity, and fit in a car. The problem was always, can you make hydrogen fuel at a price point that makes any sense to anybody. And the answer to that to date has been no.

Ballard’s talks with potential buyers is admission that dream of hydrogen fuel car is dead: analyst The story has a keen interpretation of the sale’s meaning from Research Capital analyst Jon Hykawy:(more…)

-- but if I've said it once ..

Labels: , , ,

 
  Recent great lakes bird deaths
The likely cause:
How birds become exposed to botulism, Cooley explained, begins with a bacteria called clostridium botulism. This bacteria thrives in water with low oxygen levels producing a toxin that can get into sediments. Invasive species like quagga and zebra mussels filter the sediments and pick up the bacteria which they pass onto other aquatic life like round gobies which eat the mussels. From there, birds eat the fish.

http://www.petoskeynews.com/articles/2007/11/24/news/news04.txt


death toll high for Great Lakes birds

As a conservative estimate of the total shoreline distance between these endpoints is roughly 350 miles, potentially 7500 birds have potentially perished within this region alone...


The top five species that we have documented [deaths of] are Common Loon (508), Long-tailed duck (505), White-winged scoter (207)...

The most notable Common Loon among our discoveries was a banded adult from Seney NWR who had been monitored for 14 years and during this time produced 17 chicks, including one this season. His discovery stands as the first evidence that a portion of the very high Common Loon numbers represents birds breeding in Michigan, where the species remains a threatened species...

Carcasses from a wide variety of bird species collected along the lake have tested positive for botulism E at the Michigan DNR's Wildlife Disease Lab. This current outbreak on Lake Michigan follows a trend of increasing botulism-related mortality on the Great Lakes; only Lake Superior has thus far remained exempt from the problem.

More about botulism E here:

http://www.miseagrant.umich.edu/habitat/avian-botulism-faq.html

Carcasses from a wide variety of bird species collected along the lake have tested positive for botulism E - at the Michigan DNR’s Wildlife Disease Lab.
http://www.michigan.gov/emergingdiseases/0,1607,7-186-25805-75891--,00.html

Another ballast water gift. Will Congress ever slam the door on the sickness introduced by oceangoing vessels whose owners can (and must) shoulder the cost of stopping invasive species?

Comment and link from David Dempsey The Great Lakes Blogger
 
Nov 21, 2007
  Research Company Tells Printer Vendors To Greenwash Image
Apparently without realizing or caring that greenwashing is a negative term, Lyra Research, which tracks the digital imaging industry, sent out an email newsletter yesterday with the headline: "Printer Vendors Need to Greenwash Their Image," CNET reports. The newsletter described how companies aiming to appeal to green consumers are painting a green face, without necessarily cleaning By Environmental Leader

Labels:

 
  GreenBust - you can't even find a single reference to being green on nbc.com today

NBC's Vast Green Wasteland or Lipstick on a Pig

las-vegas-2.jpgWhat a total dud NBC's Green Week turned out to be. I thought that

  1. the shows would find clever ways to promote green themes
  2. this would launch NBC on becoming greener.

Not! Indeed, the only good news is that the shows bombed across the board. Looks like viewers aren't suckered by greenwashing.

As for #2, you can't even find a single reference to being green on nbc.com today (you have to click on the tiny "corporate info" item at the bottom, and then look for the "Green is Universal" link under Headlines.). But, amazingly, what you will see on the NBC homepage is multiple ads for the Nissan Rogue, a cross-over SUV that gets 23 or 24 mpg! I guess green isn't really that universal. [And, coincidentally, the TV writers are striking in part because greedy producers won't share this kind of online ad revenue with them.]

The shows were very, very lame from a green perspective. The funniest was 30 Rock (click on David Schwimmer picture/Greenzo episode), but it was a brutal satire on corporate greenwashing. The only person who is genuinely green is Schwimmer, who is a stereotypically obnoxious about the environment. Al Gore has a funny cameo, but he is mainly spoofing himself.

Scrubs is pretty funny, but the janitor's effort to green the hospital fails for lack of interest. Thanks NBC! Grist was similarly disappointed with the Thursday night line-up.
Deal or No Deal had the models saying things like "Recycling is Cool, America" Recycling? Seriously? Uhh, that is like, so 1980s retro, please! Even dumber, Kermit the Frog (or what sounded like a lame imitation of him) was on the show to green it up, although he didn't actually say any environmental things that I recall. But he was green-colored!

What really convinced me this was not just a meaningless but actually a counterproductive exercise was that I happened to catch Las Vegas. NBC should be embarrassed for calling this a "green" episode (you can watch the episode, titled, "It's Not Easy Being Green" — gosh, how original — here):

(more…)

 

Labels:

 
  REPORT FINDS CONNECTION BETWEEN IMPLANTED RFID CHIPS AND CANCER IN ANIMALS
CASPIAN - A new paper titled "Microchip-Induced Tumors in Laboratory Rodents and Dogs: A Review of the Literature 1990-2006" has been released by CASPIAN. The full, 48-page paper provides a review of the academic literature showing a causal link between implanted radio-frequency microchip transponders and cancer in laboratory rodents and dogs. In addition, a brief, four-page synopsis of the full report is being made available.

In six of the articles, between 0.8% and 10.2% of laboratory mice and rats developed malignant tumors around or adjacent to the microchips, and several researchers suggested the actual tumor rate may have been higher. Two additional articles reported microchip-related cancer in dogs.

In almost all cases, the malignant tumors, typically sarcomas, arose at the site of the implants and grew to surround and fully encase the devices. In several cases the tumors also metastasized or spread to other parts of the animals.

Dr. Robert Benezra, head of the Cancer Biology Genetics Program at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, was quoted as saying, "There's no way in the world, having read this information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my skin, or in one of my family members."
 
Soource linked:prorev.com
 
  Company Feeds Natural Gas Pipeline with Biogas from Manure

From  EERE :

Environmental Power Corporation announced early this month that it has completed a facility to convert manure and other agricultural waste into a methane-rich biogas that will be sold as natural gas. The Huckabay Ridge facility in Stephenville, Texas, will employ anaerobic digesters to convert manure into biogas. Bacteria in the oxygen-free digester vessels feed on the wastes, producing a gas consisting mostly of methane and carbon dioxide. Environmental Power then conditions the biogas to natural gas standards and distributes it via a commercial natural gas pipeline. The company is currently selling the natural gas to the Lower Colorado River Authority, and in October 2008, it will begin selling natural gas to Pacific Gas and Electric Company under a new 10-year contract. The Huckabay Ridge facility has the capacity to produce 635 billion Btu of natural gas per year, enough to provide all the energy needs for more than 6,000 average U.S. homes. See the Environmental Power press release.

Landfills are another major source of methane, and as North America's leading provider of waste services, Waste Management has a corner on the landfill gas market. The company currently captures and produces energy from enough landfill gas to meet the energy needs of a million homes per year, and in an environmental initiative announced in October, the company committed to doubling its energy production by 2020. But for the sheer elegance of its approach, it's hard to beat the Prometheus Energy Company, which creates liquefied natural gas (LNG) from landfill gas and delivers it to vehicle fleets in Southern California. The elegance comes in with the company's purchase of an LNG-fueled Kenworth tractor, which is now being used to deliver the LNG. So the company is burning its own landfill gas to deliver landfill gas to other users. The first 10,000-gallon shipment was delivered to the Orange County Transit Authority, which operates a fleet of 232 LNG-fueled buses. See the Waste Management press release (PDF 48 KB) and the Prometheus Energy press release (PDF 63 KB). Download Adobe Reader.

 
Nov 20, 2007
  "Coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel, is the crack cocaine of the developing world." -- Alan Zarembo, L.A. Times, 18 Nov. 2007

 

 
  China is serious and pulling Polluter Finances
Reuters: Twelve polluting enterprises have had crucial bank loans recalled, suspended or rejected as China's new "green-credit policy" kicks into action, Friday's China Youth Daily said. Decades of heavy industrialisation have made water from some of China's lakes and rivers so polluted it is no longer usable, with untreated waste from factories and other enterprises pumped directly into water sources. The report did not name the companies but outlined several cases of which ..

VIA ecologicalinternet.org & Reuters News
 
 
  "commodity" -- as in, Michigan's Great Lakes water is up for sale. Grand Rapids Press and water as a commodity - Yesterday's Grand Rapids (MI) Press editorial distrusting the motives of a national water commission proposal is well-taken. A national water conservation commission makes more sense, not a panel that might just rework America's natural plumbing and take a gulp out of the Great Lakes. But just two weeks ago, the same Grand Rapids newspaper headlined an article about the commercial sale of Great Lakes Basin water from Evart, Michigan, with the word "commodity" -- as in, Michigan's Great Lakes water is up for sale. There's an obvious inconsistency in these attitudes (Full story links from David Dempsey here). 
Nov 19, 2007
  In America, "Safety" should not be a consumer "choice". it should be the industry standard.
I thought this was a joke when I read it over at Joel Makower's blog,(Is green marketing just a series of lies? ) but "terrachoice" is actually rating "greenwashing".
Read it here: "The Six Sins of Greenwashing"

A study released today by Terrachoice Environmental Marketing randomly surveyed 1,018 common consumer products ranging from toothpaste to caulking to shampoo to printers, and found that 99% were guilty of some form of “greenwashing.” They have separated greenwashing into six categories, listed below. TerraChoice President Scott McDougall says “The products we surveyed made a total of 1,753 claims, and 99% per cent committed at least one of the Six Sins of Greenwashing. During a recent audit of "bigbox" stores.

I don't get out a lot to shop… however, I have had dozens of examples sent to me and viewed 100's of examples of "false and misleading" green claims on consumable products. Simply watching "treehugger" or GRIST stories may find 1000's.

TerraChoice's own study exemplifies one problem greater than any other.

There are NO, clear, relevant or constant standards that focus on protecting both the consumer and environment.

NO NEW standards need to be made. If these consumer products simply fell under FDA, OSHA, EPA, DOT and WHMIS standards… no consumer would be in the dark.

The problem is, then there would be no need for "green marketing" companies and "green" product branding as it WOULD and SHOULD be the law to protect consumers.

Sorry, with the millions of Americans homes tainted with toxic toy's, cleaners, food and cosmetics… it is about time we made this a solid law.

I do not need a "survey" to tell me 80%* of consumers would buy products that were "actually" safer for them and the environment.

These people were told that the toys they buy their children were "safe" and regulated by "standards".

I don't believe any "fuzzy & feel good" label Language can satisfy safety aspects of a product.

JUST start enforcing what is already know to be hazardous from these products.

And if "terrachoice's" standard protects better than all existing standards, I am sure that federal regulators would be happy to adopt it as the "industry standard" as they did with the paint industry.

Find Consumer sources for safer products and labels:

http://www.greenerchoices.org

http://www.householdproducts.nlm.nih.gov

Free Guide for Handling Household Chemicals
Green-wash (green'wash', -wôsh') - verb: the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or servi